I was fortunate enough to attend the aging policy summit last week. I was able to hear local representatives, leading thinkers on aging, and my favorite, Skip Humphrey speak about our challenges and opportunities to address aging issues this legislative session.
The majority of the attendees were service providers, and most of them lived in the Twin Ciies Metro area (not surprising with the frigid temperatures keeping those outstate at home for the day).
During the summit they polled attendees to get feedback from there on what Minnesota priorities should be in regard to aging issues. I've pulled the most interesting from the discussions here:
1. The budget requires that legislators and the Governor make decisions about state revenues and spending. Regarding aging services across the continuum, should they…
a.Maintain current funding for aging services through tax/revenue increases
b.Increase funding for aging services through (larger) tax/revenue increases
c. Limit cuts in aging services through smaller tax/revenue increases
d. Reduce aging services proportionately based on currently projected revenues
The answers:
2. What is the most significant service barrier that prohibits older persons from remaining at thome as they age and require services?
a.Services are unavailable
b.Services are unreliable
c.Services are unaffordable
d.Lack of knowledge about services
e.None of the above
The attendees answered:
3. Do you think communities would find value in achieving designation as a COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME?
a. Absolutely-good for business, desirable fr retaining senior residents
b. They would find value but find it hard to achieve
c. Cities have too many other priorities
d. Cities would not want such a designation
The attendees answered:
See more information about the aging summit










